Assessment of the antibiotics resistant and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from Iraqi hospitalized patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63964/atmj.2026.2.3.14Abstract
Background: Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a leading cause of hospital acquired infections. It has multidrug resistance and high biofilm production leading to difficult treatment.
Objectives: This study aimed to identify P. aeruginosa from clinical samples in Baghdad, Iraq. It also correlated the antibiotic susceptibility to quantitative biofilm production.
Materials and Methods: 150 samples were collected from hospitals of Baghdad by a cross-sectional study. The isolates were identified by culture, biochemical tests and Vitek 2 system. The Kirby-Bauer method (CLSI) was used to test 10 antibiotics. The bio-film formation capacity was examined by crystal violet microtiter plate method at an absorbance of 630 nm.
Results: one hundred isolates, were identified as P. aeruginosa, Infections were found in both sexes. Males made up 54% of cases while females 46% with non-significant P-value (p=0.236) in different age categories. The majority sites of infection from burns in (29%) and Urine (17%), Sputum and ear swabs each contributed (12%), Wound samples (10%) and Blood (8%) with highly significant (p=0.0001) between sources of infection. The results for antibiotic susceptibility test Trimethoprim showed the highest resistance (95%) followed by gentamicin (58%), ceftazidime (56%), piperacillin (52%), amikacin (52%), and levofloxacin (45%) in highly significant(p=0.0001). While colistin emerged as the most effective antimicrobial agent with 85% of the isolates being sensitive. Favorable sensitivity was also maintained for norfloxacin (58%), meropenem (52%), and imipenem (48%). The differences between resistance categories were all highly significant (p < 0.0001), indicating a severe resistance burden within the studied strains. 62% percent of isolates showed resistant phenotype with an overwhelming majority being the extensively drug resistant (XDR) phenotype (42%), Multi drug resistant (MDR) in 15% and Pan drug resistant in 5% . The One hundred isolates formed biofilm (100%) and moderate biofilm producers were predominant (62%) followed by strong 29%, weak 9% . The distribution of isolates by biofilm formation ability and gender shown highly significant in P-value 0.0001 with ratio 63% in males while 37% in females. Also, the biofilm of isolates increased in age categories 41-60, 21-40 37%, 33% respectively. The results also showed the relationship between Biofilm production and clinical sources, the Burn, urine, sputum, and ear swabs isolates showed highly significant in biofilm formation(0.0001 , 0.0079, 0.0094 and 0.0098) respectively. Across, the results had shown significant P-value in wound and skin swabs (0.0317, 0.0483).While non-significant P-value in Blood, ETT, Palatal tissue, tissue, stool, pus and cystic fibrosis. Several antibiotics also showed a significant link with biofilm strength. Such as piperacillin and colistin, resistance was significantly higher in stronger biofilm producers (p=0.0084, 0.0087), also the results showed that significant ratio in Norfloxacin, Meropenem (P-value 0.0316, 0.0325). and non-significant results in other antibiotics resistance. The multi-drug resistance classification was correlated with the level of biofilm three core tires formation this overall association was highly significant (p = 0.0001). However, the sensitive isolates group (p = 0.0001), the XDR group (p = 0.0001), and the PDR group (p = 0.0497) showed highly significant relationship while the MDR group non-significant (p = 0.2174). In particular, the majority of the XDR isolates (moderate 28, strong 11 and weak 3) (66.7%, 26.2% and 7.1% respectively) were corroborated the association between the highest level of resistance and strong biofilm formation.
Conclusion: Clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates showed widespread antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation, highlighting the urgent need for effective antimicrobial stewardship.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 THIS IS AN OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE UNDER THE CC BY LICENSE http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






